Re: [sca-policy] Revised wording for Issue 94

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

I've added a few small tweaks on top of what Mike Did. Ashok, there are two comments in there for you to consider before the telecon Monday.

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/35027/sca-policy-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4-Issue94_mje_dab.doc
[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/35026/sca-policy-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4-Issue94_mje_dab.pdf

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

Mike Edwards ---11/04/2009 07:47:49 AM---Folks, Here are suggested updates to the wording of the proposal, mostly to allow

From:	Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
To:	ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
Cc:	OASIS Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	11/04/2009 07:47 AM
Subject:	Re: [sca-policy] Revised wording for Issue 94

---

Folks, 

Here are suggested updates to the wording of the proposal, mostly to allow the wording to flow better. 

I note one significant point:  the proposal involves adding the capability for a WSDL document to have a <requires/> 
subelement to a portType element - this requires an update in the SCA Assembly specification, along with an updated 
XSD. 




Note that the PDF marks more changes than are present in the Word file, for some reason that escapes me. 
The Word file is definitive in this case. 


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
To:	OASIS Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	30/10/2009 14:04
Subject:	[sca-policy] Revised wording for Issue 94

---

I added some words and added the definition of the <requires> element in 
the Schema.  See attached.
As we realized on Monday's call, the Assembly schema does not include 
the <policySetAttachment> element.
So, if we agree to resolve Issue 94 with this proposal, we should open 
an Assembly issue to add both
<requires> and <policySetAttachment> to the Assembly Schema.
-- 
All the best, Ashok
[attachment "sca-policy-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4-Issue94.doc" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] [attachment "sca-policy-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4-Issue94.pdf" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

[attachment "sca-policy-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4-Issue94_mje.pdf" deleted by David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] [attachment "sca-policy-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4-Issue94_mje.doc" deleted by David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php