OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-policy message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-policy] Conformance statement 90030



Folks,

"asyncInvocation" is essentially an operation-level intent, since what it does is to make a statement about
the relative timing of the request message and the response message of an operation.  The implication is
that the response message is likely to occur a long time after the request message is received.

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com



From: David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
To: sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 19/04/2010 21:30
Subject: Re: [sca-policy] Conformance statement 90030





Operation means WSDL operation.  See lines 960-964 (cd03 pdf), POL90010,
POL90013, etc for similar usage of operation.

When we agreed to POL90030, we decided that interface operations needed to
be the target of the statement because it is possible to attach intents to
an operation. Since the asyncInvocation and propagatesTransaction are
incompatible, we decided that constraints at the operation level allowed
for interfaces that contained these intents on different operations.

Does that help?

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com


|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
 >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 |ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>                                                                                                        |
 >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
 >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 |OASIS Policy <sca-policy@lists.oasis-open.org>                                                                                                    |
 >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
 >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 |04/19/2010 01:57 PM                                                                                                                               |
 >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
 >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 |[sca-policy] Conformance statement 90030                                                                                                          |
 >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





On today's call Dave said the POL-TA-90033 which is based on conformance
statement POL90030 should
mention "operation".  POL90030 reads "The */asyncInvocation/* intent and
the */propagatesTransaction/* intent MUST NOT be applied to the same
service or reference operation."

I read the word "operation"in the above sentence as "message"  but
perhaps it means something different.
The predicate for POL-TA-90033 reads "<component/> <reference/> or
<service/> marked with both /asynchInvocation/ and
/propagatesTransaction/ intents" .  Should <reference/> or <service/> be
changed to <operation/> or to
<reference/> or <service/> or <operation/>
--
All the best, Ashok

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php









Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU








[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]