RE: [sdd] [Action Item #0053 - Req. 2.7.2]

["Danielson, Debra J" <Debra.Danielson@ca.com>]

Hi Jay,

I think we may need to put back "on the media" to differentiate this
requirement from one where files are repositioned or renamed on the
target.  But I am certainly fine with removing any rationale for the
requirement from the requirement. 


Regards,
Debra

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Nash [mailto:jay@o-ms.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 7:32 AM
To: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [sdd] [Action Item #0053 - Req. 2.7.2]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

All,

My objection is to the ambiguous language of "optimal access". I propose
rewording the requirement to


2.7.2 The packaging specification must support the ability for files to
be repositioned and/or renamed.

from

2.7.2 The packaging specification must support the ability for files to
be repositioned and/or renamed on the media for optimal access and to
remove duplication.

I have similar concerns about each of the requirements in this section.
- --
- --
Jay Nash, CTO
OMS SafeHarbor
128 Warren St
Lowell MA 01852
978.937.2363 ext.111
978.937.3784 fax

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEBuXMHsIa/RmVc78RAl8MAJ9m3JOPBvVEpn+Ug8VaRgcSnY5MAQCeLJhe
L1JohAH0da4iUaVD4FKddg8=
=RTZt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----