OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sdd message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [sdd] 2.1.1.6


I agree with you on this one. In some cases I wrote two sentences when my brain was unable to splice the requirement together logically.  :-) 
 
cheers,
 
-jp

--
ca
Senior Software Engineer
Office: 630 505-6150
Cell: 847-224-9196
john.patton@ca.com

 


From: Julia McCarthy [mailto:julia@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:43 AM
To: Patton, John H
Cc: Robert Dickau; sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [sdd] 2.1.1.6

I think that in this case the requirements in the two sentence are not separate. Specifying requirements is a subset of specifying information required for rollback and undo. I like Robert's wording best.

Julia McCarthy
Autonomic Computing Enablement
julia@us.ibm.com
Tie/Line 349/8156
877-261-0391


Inactive hide details for "Patton, John H" <John.Patton@ca.com>"Patton, John H" <John.Patton@ca.com>


          "Patton, John H" <John.Patton@ca.com>

          03/02/2006 08:33 PM


To

"Robert Dickau" <rdickau@macrovision.com>, Julia McCarthy/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

cc

<sdd@lists.oasis-open.org>

Subject

RE: [sdd] 2.1.1.6

inline.....


From: Robert Dickau [mailto:rdickau@macrovision.com]
Sent:
Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:53 PM
To:
Julia McCarthy
Cc:
sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:
RE: [sdd] 2.1.1.6

A vote for Option 2, possibly combining into a single sentence (to avoid construction "This includes..."):

The SDD specification must support definition of information required by a provisioning application or installation program to perform rollback and undo operations, including information about requirements that must be met prior to performing these operations.
[Patton, John H] I agree with the rewrite here a bit more than the 2 separate sentences. Although, where I split a requirement into 2 sentences, I envisioned them as separate, but related, requirements.


-jp


From: Julia McCarthy [mailto:julia@us.ibm.com]
Sent:
Thursday, 02 March 2006 11:02 am
To:
sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:
[sdd] 2.1.1.6

John has done some extensive rewording which he sent to us in a separate note. I'm going to start pulling those requirements out one at a time for discussion. Please try to respond - even just to say you agree.


Starting with 2.1.1.6. Here's John's suggested rewrite:
Option 1) 2.1.1.6 The SDD specification must support the ability for the author to define the requirements that must be met for a provisioning application or installation program to rollback or undo a deployment lifecycle operation. The SDD specification must support the ability for the author to define information needed for a provisioning application or installation program to rollback or undo a deployment lifecycle operation.


Here's my additional wordsmithing based both on our discussion about phrasing and just my own idea of what makes a sentence understandable. I believe that this stays true to the meaning of John's rewrite.

Option 2) 2.1.1.6 The SDD specification must support definition of information required by a provisioning application or installation program to perform rollback and undo lifecycle operations. This includes information about requirements that must be met prior to performing these operations.


Please vote for option 1 or option 2, or propose an alternative along with providing your reasons for suggesting an alternative.

Julia McCarthy
Autonomic Computing Enablement
julia@us.ibm.com
Tie/Line 349/8156
877-261-0391



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]