I like your rewording, James. Anyone who disagrees with this wording, please
respond by EOD Monday. If I've heard no objects by that time I'll ask Randy to
include this new wording in the requirements doc.
Here is the new wording
for those of you who don't want to page down:
2.1.3.1 The SDD
specification must define information sufficient to
enable performance of
lifecycle operations by provisioning application
or installation programs
using standard resource or artifact interfaces,
without requiring
additional resource- or artifact- specific code
or
knowledge.
Julia McCarthy
Autonomic Computing
Enablement
julia@us.ibm.com
Tie/Line
349/8156
877-261-0391
James Falkner
<james.falkner@sun.com>
03/15/2006 06:36 PM |
|
Julia McCarthy wrote:
> I'm taking the survey right now and I find I really do still disagree
> with 2.1.3.1. I just had a conversation with Christine and she came up
> with this alternative wording that addresses my concern. Maybe we can
> make progress on this discussion before next meeting and then we won't
> have to spend much time on it.
>
> Proposed alternative:
> 2.1.3.1 The SDD specification must define information sufficient to
> enable performance of lifecycle operations by provisioning application
> or installation programs using standard resource interfaces, without
> requiring additional resource-specific code or knowledge.
I suggest that you change "resource" to "resource or artifact". So, the
re-wording is:
2.1.3.1 The SDD specification must define information sufficient to
enable performance of lifecycle operations by provisioning application
or installation programs using standard resource or artifact interfaces,
without requiring additional resource- or artifact- specific code or
knowledge.
-jhf-
