[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification Draft.doc)uploaded
Did I hear that right? The XSD (XML Schema) is not part of the SDD specification? I understand why graphics can't be part of the normative part of the spec (after all, it's duplicative) but the XSD is not part of it either? I thought it was the ultimate and primary output of the TC... -jhf- Danielson, Debra J wrote: > No, I meant to reply to all… > > > > Regards, > > Debra > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Julia McCarthy [mailto:julia@us.ibm.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 07, 2006 3:53 PM > *To:* Danielson, Debra J > *Subject:* RE: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification > Draft.doc) uploaded > > This is the reason I wanted to use the graph pictures from the xsd > editor. They clearly show choices and sequences - things you can't show > well with just xml. Randy and Tom tell me the xsd is not part of the > specification so type graph pictures can't be normative. They could be > included in non-normative sections and then referred to in normative > sections - that's what they do in the SPML2 specification which is being > held up as a model. That seems awkward so I just punted in this first > section and only used the xml editor graphics. > > I'd like to discuss this with the TC. > > (Did you mean to reply to only me? Shall we move this discussion back to > the whole group?) > > Julia McCarthy > Tivoli Development > Deployment Engine Design > julia@us.ibm.com > 349/8156 > 877-261-0391 > > > > Inactive hide details for "Danielson, Debra J" > <Debra.Danielson@ca.com>"Danielson, Debra J" <Debra.Danielson@ca.com> > > *"Danielson, Debra J" <Debra.Danielson@ca.com>* > > 06/07/2006 02:49 PM > > > > To > > > > > Julia McCarthy/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > > cc > > > > Subject > > > > > RE: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification Draft.doc) > uploaded > > > > > > > Hi – > > I think that some convention to illustrate that would be useful. I just > wanted to confirm that it was in fact intended to be either, as there > was only the one identified in the design editor. > > Regards, > Debra > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Julia McCarthy [mailto:julia@us.ibm.com] * > Sent:* Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:28 PM* > Cc:* sdd@lists.oasis-open.org* > Subject:* RE: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification > Draft.doc) uploaded > > Section 2.1 > > Under optional information there is a section on the Version and the Fix > elements, but that isn't represented in the schema above - which is > correct? > > When you say "the schema above" I think you must mean the graphic of the > xml in the xml design editor. There is a choice between version and fix. > You can't have both in the same xml file so a graphic of xml (as opposed > to xsd) has to pick one or the other. I suppose I could put side by side > graphics showing each of the choices. Do you think that would be better? > > Julia McCarthy > Tivoli Development > Deployment Engine Design > julia@us.ibm.com > 349/8156 > 877-261-0391 > > > > Inactive hide details for "Danielson, Debra J" > <Debra.Danielson@ca.com>"Danielson, Debra J" <Debra.Danielson@ca.com> > > *"Danielson, Debra J" <Debra.Danielson@ca.com>* > > 06/06/2006 02:10 PM > > > > To > > > > > <sdd@lists.oasis-open.org> > > cc > > > > Subject > > > > > RE: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification Draft.doc) > uploaded > > > > > > > My comments on this section (excluding the items still open from the > previous review). I will not be able to attend the call tomorrow am, as > I am out of the office, so please respond via email. > > Thanks, > Debra > > Section 2 > > Informational question? What's the value of the size attribute? > > Section 2.1 > > Re: The length of the shortDescription is not restricted, should it be? > > > We do not have explicit limits for tool tip information in CA, > but only suggest "short phrases". > > Under optional information there is a section on the Version and the Fix > elements, but that isn't represented in the schema above - which is > correct? > > Section 2.2 > > No comments. > > Section 2.3 > > Is this directly from the ACS specification? > > Section 2.4 > > No comments. > > > > Regards, > Debra > > -----Original Message----- > From: julia@us.ibm.com [mailto:julia@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 5:28 PM > To: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [sdd] Groups - SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification > Draft.doc) uploaded > > ***Please review section 2 in this document and discuss issues via > email.*** > > This version contains the group 1 sections reworked based on the ACS > alignment. Note that most of the content of the submission draft outline > has been stripped out to make this simpler to review. > > -- Ms. Julia McCarthy > > The document revision named SDD Specification Draft (SDD Specification > Draft.doc) has been submitted by Ms. Julia McCarthy to the OASIS > Solution Deployment Descriptor (SDD) TC document repository. This > document is revision #1 of SDD Specification Draft.doc. > > Document Description: > The current draft of the SDD Specification for internal TC review. > > View Document Details:_ > _http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sdd/document.php?document_i > d=18517 > > Download Document: _ > _http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sdd/download.php/18517/SDD% > <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sdd/download.php/18517/SDD%25> > 20Specification%20Draft.doc > > Revision: > This document is revision #1 of SDD Specification Draft.doc. The > document details page referenced above will show the complete revision > history. > > > PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email > application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able > to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your > web browser. > > -OASIS Open Administration >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]