sdd message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sdd] Language_bundle
- From: Randy George <randyg@us.ibm.com>
- To: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:20:25 -0500
James,
I think that the current definition
can provide this, i.e. it is a token. This token provides a base
name which some "best practice" can be used to extend to language
specific bundles. I think that is it a good idea to follow the JRE
approach. If you agree, we just need to spec how this token should
be used vs. changing the schema.
Regards,
Randy George
Senior Technical Staff Member
Provisioning Architecture
Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group
Austin, TX
(512) 838-0752 T/L 678-0752
James Falkner <james.falkner@sun.com>
06/15/2006 12:00 PM
|
To
| Julia McCarthy/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| Re: [sdd] Language_bundle |
|
How about the "language_bundle" attribute
identifies a _basename_,
to which locale names are added as suffixes in a well-known strategy. For
example, if you specify "foo" as the basename, and you are running
in the
ja_JA locale with utf8 encoding, then runtimes would know to look for
foo_ja_JA.utf8
foo_ja_JA
foo_ja
foo_en
foo
Just like how Sun's Java runtime environment looks up ResourceBundles.
-jhf-
Julia McCarthy wrote:
> Let's try to make some progress before next meeting.
>
> Issue #8 - Can there be more than one Language bundle for the descriptor?
>
> Here's the text on this issue copied from Debra's email of 6/6.
> Item #8 Even though the language bundles may be really small for the
> descriptor, I think that it is worthwhile to simple define a common
> mechanism for handling multiple language bundles. My experience is
that
> translations take place very asynchronously, and that trying to fuse,
> merge and manage a single bundle can be error prone.
>
> This makes sense to me. Does anyone think this is a /bad / idea? Can
> someone suggest a schema change that would support this? The current
> schema looks like this:
>
> <attributeGroup name="DescriptorInfo">
> <attribute name="schemaVersion" type="vsn:VersionString"
fixed="1.0"
> use="required" />
> <attribute name="descriptorID" type="descriptInfo:UUID"
use="optional"/>
> <attributeGroup ref="id:BuildInfo"/>
> <attribute name="size" type="integer" use="optional"/>
> <attribute name="language_bundle" type="token"
use="optional"
> default="sddBundle"/>
> </attributeGroup>
>
>
> Julia McCarthy
> Tivoli Development
> Deployment Engine Design
> julia@us.ibm.com
> 349/8156
> 877-261-0391
>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]