[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sdd] December F2F meeting -- e-mail poll
I have a "medium" (again, salsa scale) preference for keeping the F2F in Orlando, as I would put my chances at a London trip at 50/50. But as far as the dates go, they are fine for me. -jhf- Brent Miller wrote: > > SDD TC, > > [Please note: this is not a duplicate of previous e-mail! This concerns > our OTHER planned F2F meeting] > > The ballot to determine dates for our planned December (perhaps > November? see below) meeting has closed, with the week of Dec. 4 being > the leading candidate. > > As discussed in today's call, per the e-mail I previously sent, OASIS is > planning an adoption forum meeting the week of November 27 (the week > before the ballot "winner") and is encouraging TCs to schedule F2F > meetings during that week (in addition, this would enable us to present > our TC's status to a broader OASIS body and participate in wider OASIS > discussions and networking). Hence, we agreed to see how many TC members > could attend during the OASIS meeting (presumed dates would be November > 30 and December 1; we probably could schedule another day on November 27 > (the OASIS meeting is Nov. 28-29) and/or evening sessions as required. > Rather than incur the overhead of a ballot, we agreed to take an e-mail > poll. > > Members, please reply to this e-mail and indicate whether or not you > could attend a 2- to 3-day TC F2F meeting in London on November > 30/December 1 (and perhaps also Nov. 27). Note that the venue would > change from Orlando (hosted by Sun) to London (OASIS venue) if we make > this change.. > > I'll compile and distribute the results. > > I would like to close on the date for the F2F meeting during next week's > call, so please reply as soon as possible. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > Brent > > Brent A. Miller > STSM, Autonomic Computing Architecture > IBM Corp. > Tel. 919-543-6959 (TIE 441) > > "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in > practice, there is." > -- Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]