Re: [sdd] RE: SDD OASIS Standard Submission

[Randy George <randyg@us.ibm.com>]

I think that the TC needs to think hard
about a 1.1 rev of the standard.  I can not take another round of
this process.

Regards,
Randy George

Senior Technical Staff Member
Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group
Austin, TX  
(512) 838-0752     T/L 678-0752

From:	"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
To:	Brent Miller/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:	<sdd@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	06/13/08 01:22 PM
Subject:	[sdd] RE: SDD OASIS Standard Submission

---

Hi Brent,
 
  The first thing
we have to do is to run a Special Majority ballot for the TC to approve
submitting the specification for OASIS Standard ballot – remember we couldn’t
do this until we had the three statements of use; once that ballot has
been approved you can then submit for OS vote, but you won’t make the
15 June cutoff date since it’s a 7-day ballot.
 
Here’s what I need right
now: links to the actual email that included the statements of use
 
Here’s what I’ll need
for the actual submission: the submission in the body of an email message
rather than a word document.
 
Thanks!
 
Mary
 
From: Brent Miller [mailto:bamiller@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:11 PM
To: Mary McRae
Cc: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SDD OASIS Standard Submission
Importance: High
 

Mary, 

The OASIS SDD TC has received the necessary three statements of use and
so now seeks to submit our approved Committee Specification to the Membership
of OASIS for consideration as an OASIS Standard.

The attached document contains all of the required information and pointers
to documents according to the OASIS TC process.

Could you please review and verify this information and initiate the OASIS
Standard approval process? 

Please let me know if you need more information.

Thank you. 



Regards,
Brent

Brent A. Miller
Senior Technical Staff Member
Lead Architect, Autonomic Computing
IBM Corp.
Tel. 919-543-6959 (TIE 441)

"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
in practice, there is." 
-- Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut