OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sdd message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: A question on Profiles

Hi Kirk,


I thought I had cleaned up the namespaces in my last submission, but it looks that I did not.  I’ll get that corrected and upload the new version.





From: Wilson, Kirk D [mailto:Kirk.Wilson@ca.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 3:19 PM
To: Brent Miller
Cc: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [sdd] A question on Profiles


Quick question if I may on the current examples provided with the N10 Profile Revisit Proposal:


Cim-profiles.xsd defines a namespace: http://docs.oasis-open.org/sdd/ns/cim-profile


However, the SimpleAppClient.xml file specifies a canonical WS-CIM namespace for the CIM_Resources profile: http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wscim/1.0.0/cim-schema/2.19.0/.  I don’t understand this, because the cim-profiles.xsd has no similarity to the WS-CIM spec.  For example, the CIM class names that cim-profiles.xsd defines as types are declared as elements in a WS-CIM conformant scheme.  So there is a major mismatch between the namespaces.


Should the namespace in the SimpleAppClient SDD xml correspond to the targetNamespace of cim-profiles.xsd?  If not, I would appreciate an explanation of what is going on.


Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.

CA, Inc.

Research Staff Member, CA Labs

Council for Technical Excellence

Tele: 603 823 7146  (preferred)

Cell: 603 991 8873

Fax: 603 823 7148



This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]