[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: A question on Profiles
I thought I had cleaned up the namespaces in my last submission, but it looks that I did not. I’ll get that corrected and upload the new version.
Quick question if I may on the current examples provided with the N10 Profile Revisit Proposal:
Cim-profiles.xsd defines a namespace: http://docs.oasis-open.org/sdd/ns/cim-profile
However, the SimpleAppClient.xml file specifies a canonical WS-CIM namespace for the CIM_Resources profile: http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wscim/1.0.0/cim-schema/2.19.0/. I don’t understand this, because the cim-profiles.xsd has no similarity to the WS-CIM spec. For example, the CIM class names that cim-profiles.xsd defines as types are declared as elements in a WS-CIM conformant scheme. So there is a major mismatch between the namespaces.
Should the namespace in the SimpleAppClient SDD xml correspond to the targetNamespace of cim-profiles.xsd? If not, I would appreciate an explanation of what is going on.
Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.
Research Staff Member, CA Labs
Council for Technical Excellence
Tele: 603 823 7146 (preferred)
Cell: 603 991 8873
Fax: 603 823 7148
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately.