[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: A question on Profiles
Hi Kirk, I thought I had cleaned up the namespaces in my last submission,
but it looks that I did not. I’ll get that corrected and upload the
new version. Cheers, -Jason From: Wilson, Kirk D
[mailto:Kirk.Wilson@ca.com] Quick
question if I may on the current examples provided with the N10 Profile Revisit
Proposal: Cim-profiles.xsd
defines a namespace: http://docs.oasis-open.org/sdd/ns/cim-profile However,
the SimpleAppClient.xml file specifies a canonical WS-CIM namespace for the
CIM_Resources profile: http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wscim/1.0.0/cim-schema/2.19.0/.
I don’t understand this, because the cim-profiles.xsd has no
similarity to the WS-CIM spec. For example, the CIM class names that
cim-profiles.xsd defines as types are declared as elements in a WS-CIM
conformant scheme. So there is a major mismatch between the namespaces. Should
the namespace in the SimpleAppClient SDD xml correspond to the targetNamespace
of cim-profiles.xsd? If not, I would appreciate an explanation of what is
going on. Kirk
Wilson, Ph.D. CA,
Inc. Research
Staff Member, CA Labs Council for
Technical Excellence Tele:
603 823 7146 (preferred) Cell: 603
991 8873 Fax:
603 823 7148 This e-mail may
contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient of this communication, please delete this e-mail and notify
the sender immediately. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]