Re: [sdo] List is OSOA Issues for Discussion at this week's meeting

["Blaise Doughan" <blaise.doughan@oracle.com>]

Hello all,

 

Below are my thoughts on the proposed issues to be rejected:

 

 

SDO-23:  Add option to create SDOs by API with minimal metadata (SDO Project Objective #15)

 

It is true in SDO 2.1 that you can create the DataObjects that correspond to XML loaded without a schema using DataFactory (SDO 2.1 section 9.10).  The problem with our current solution is that the Type assigned to these DataObjects is vendor specific.  I am ok with rejecting this issue if we open another one to create a standardized open sequenced Type.

 

 

SDO 24:  Support for Attachments

 

The spirit of this issue was for the efficient handling of large binary data in DataObjects.  I am ok with rejecting this issue (as web services are out of scope) if we open another issue for the handling of large binary data in DataObjects for DAS (as DAS is in scope).

 

 

SDO 26:  SDO Properties should have an URI just like SDO types

 

I think we have a partial fix for this in SDO 2.1.  Open content properties can have a namespace URI, but the namespace URI does not factor into aspects of SDO such as XPath/SDO Path access.  I think this issue should remain open to cover the remaining issues.

 

 

-Blaise

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Bryan Aupperle

To: sdo@lists.oasis-open.org

Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 1:10 PM

Subject: Re: [sdo] List is OSOA Issues for Discussion at this week's meeting

49 is fixed in 2.1.
61 points out that unset and createDataObject methods are missing.  Unset is present in 2.1 and so this becomes a dup of 42.

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
Master Inventor

Research Triangle Park,  NC
+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com

"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com>

02/18/2008 04:37 AM

To	<sdo@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	[sdo] List is OSOA Issues for Discussion at this week's meeting

Hi Everyone,

Here is a table of issues carried over from OSOA, and how I would suggest assigning them. There are also a couple of rejections. Please look them over before the meeting.

Best Regards,
Ron
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

---

SDO-19	More Granular XML Schema Generation					Reject/ Out-of-Scope
SDO-21	Ability to turn logging on/off without clearing					DAS Support
SDO-23	Add option to create SDOs by API with minimal metadata (SDO Project Objective #15)					Reject/ Achieved in 2.1
SDO-24	Support for Attachments					Reject/ Out-of-Scope
SDO-26	SDO Properties should have an URI just like SDO types					Reject/ Achieved in 2.1
SDO-28	Clarifcation: name mangling algorithm should be specified					Static SDO
SDO-29	Clarification: Nested or non nested interfaces for nested anonymous complex type definitions					Static SDO
SDO-30	Ability to disable change tracking for certain nodes in the data object tree					DAS Support
SDO-33	Change summary does not track move					DAS Support
SDO-43	Add ChangeSummary.clearLog() method					DAS Support
SDO-44	Change Summary: Clarify the semantics of move, possible optimizations for sequenced DataObjects					DAS Support
SDO-48	C++ specification does not define mapping for SDO types Decimal, Integer, Object					Other Languages
SDO-49	C++ Specification: Type.h does not provide getDeclaredProperties()					Other Languages
SDO-51	Introduce an SDOObject class to the C++ specification					Other Languages
SDO-52	Should SDO specify what to do with CDATA sections when de-serialising XML					XML Fidelity
SDO-56	Need to improve anyType support so as not to use a wrapping Data Object for simple types					XML Fidelity
SDO-61	C++ DataObject API is incomplete					Other Languages
SDO-64	SDO needs to enable users to set runtime options					SPI