[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [sdo] [SDO-82]: Name conflicts with anonymous XSD types
Michael B. Yoder [23/Aug/07 01:43 AM] Since an anonymous type is nested in an element, the SDO user can always get at the type via the element (a type or global property name) for introspection. So the actual name of the anonymous type doesn't seem important. Perhaps this could be specified more generally, by simple same that the name must be unique but is implementation specific. Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]