Proposal for Static SDOs.doc

["Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com>]

Title: Proposal for Static SDOs.doc

<<Proposal for Static SDOs.doc>>
Hi Everyone,

Per yesterday's meeting, here is an updated version of the proposal, with behaviour wrt nested interfaces described.

I believe the proposal is consistent with JAXB 2.0 section 6.7.3, which states that anonymous XSD types map to nested classes.  I couldn't find anything in the JAXB spec that defined how unannoted nested classes are handled, but I assume symetry with 6.7.3 would mean that they correspond to annonymous types.  Just as JAXB allows @XMLType also on nested classes, we allow @SdoType on nested interfaces, so that is consistent with this proposal, too.

If there are any comments or suggestions, let me know so I can work them in before Tuesday's call, and maybe we can simply vote on the resolution then.

Ron

Proposal for Static SDOs.doc