[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: DataDirect Priorities of Remaining Issues
Hi Francois, Some of the items on
your priorities are issues that I thought were duplicates. Can you describe
what needs to be done for the following issues: SDO-33: Change
Summary does not track move - I thought that this was resolved when we decided
moving objects between containers would be tracked as a move, rather than a
create/delete. SDO-96: Deprecate
INSTANCE variables and improve bootstrapping - Now that we have the SDO
class, and INSTANCE is deprecated, what needs to be done? SDO-123: Relax
containment requirements - Now that we have OrphanHolders and projection, what
needs to be done. SDO-146: Move section
on HelperContext earlier in chapter 4 – I did this as part of the general
document clean-up when I was adding the RFC2119 wording. Does something else
need to be done? SDO-147: Make type
conversions language-independent – Type conversions are described in the
core spec, in (I think) a language neutral manner. Best Regards, Ron From: François Huaulmé
[mailto:Francois.Huaulme@datadirect.com] Hi, We have also reviewed the remaining open
issues in the SDO 3. Please find attached to this mail our priorities of the
remaining issues. We have also seen some opened C++ issues:
C++ is an interesting use case for DataDirect and I know Christophe and Brian
exchanged few mails about the C++ spec. I think the SDO C++ specification
should be re-written because of the core/language-specific distinction that has
been introduced. But I’m not sure this has been discussed lately. Thanks,
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]