RE: [search-ws-comment] Suggestions for SRU 2.0 specification document

["LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>]

> From: Edo Plantinga [mailto:Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl] 
> Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 11:14 AM
>
> To me it does not make a lot of sense to have a client-defined specification
> for range facets, if you candefine *one range only*. ... So in my opinion the
> SRU standard would be made simpler (and easier to understand by simple
> folk like me ;-) ) if it would not have a client-defined range facet definition at
> all.

I'm okay with that.  That piece of specification came from the SOLR spec and I'm sure it is as clunky for them as for us.  They'd probably thank us for dropping it.

Ralph