Fw: OASIS/SRU: ATOM/SRU Response Schema

["Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>]

Please let's not jump the gun on the scan discussion (which I hope will not
tangled into this thread).  Or the rest discussion for that matter.
Matthew, can you draft up a message about Scan.

--Ray



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Farrukh Najmi" <farrukh@WELLFLEETSOFTWARE.COM>
To: <ZNG@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: OASIS/SRU: ATOM/SRU Response Schema


> Hi Rob,
>
> IMHO we can replace explain and scan with pre-defined indexes (or
> canonical queries) and not bloat the protocol. This also makes the
> search protocol more RESTful.
>
> See archived thread on this:
>
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/search-ws/200710/msg00046.html>
>
> BTW I have updated the issue list to fix links to archived discussion
> threads on each issue so the they can be accessed without needing to
> authenticate.
> The small issue list with these fixed up links are publicly available
here:
>
> <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/search-ws/issues>
>
> Dr R. Sanderson wrote:
> > Yes, I do still exist...
> >
> > I have no significant objections.  It does bring SRU closer into line
> > with the way that the rest of the world seems to be going.  OAI-ORE
> > [which has been eating up a lot of my time these past few months] uses
> > ATOM as its primary serialisation, so it would be nice to explore the
> > synergies between ATOM/SRU and ATOM/OAI-ORE.
> >
> > What are the intentions for Explain and Scan, which don't fit into the
> > ATOM response quite so conveniently?
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Ray Denenberg wrote:
> >
> >> From: "Ryan Scherle" <rscherle@INDIANA.EDU>
> >>> Mandating Atom would have the practical effect of killing off the SRU
> >>> response format,
> >>
> >> Yes but what would be the practical effect of that?  That's one of the
> >> questions the committee is curious about.  How much is invested in that
> >> format, how much disruption would it cause an implementation to
> >> replace it
> >> with another, functionally equivalent format?
> >>
> >>> If it is possible to use Atom
> >>> in a way that feels like it was designed for search responses, great.
> >> Well, ATOM is used in OpenSearch.
> >>
> >> --Ray
> >>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh Najmi
>
> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com