[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [search-ws] Fw: OASIS/SRU: ATOM/SRU Response Schema
You are right Ray. Lets keep different issues separated. Sorry about that. Thanks. Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: > Please let's not jump the gun on the scan discussion (which I hope will not > tangled into this thread). Or the rest discussion for that matter. > Matthew, can you draft up a message about Scan. > > --Ray > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Farrukh Najmi" <farrukh@WELLFLEETSOFTWARE.COM> > To: <ZNG@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV> > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:06 PM > Subject: Re: OASIS/SRU: ATOM/SRU Response Schema > > > >> Hi Rob, >> >> IMHO we can replace explain and scan with pre-defined indexes (or >> canonical queries) and not bloat the protocol. This also makes the >> search protocol more RESTful. >> >> See archived thread on this: >> >> <http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/search-ws/200710/msg00046.html> >> >> BTW I have updated the issue list to fix links to archived discussion >> threads on each issue so the they can be accessed without needing to >> authenticate. >> The small issue list with these fixed up links are publicly available >> > here: > >> <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/search-ws/issues> >> >> Dr R. Sanderson wrote: >> >>> Yes, I do still exist... >>> >>> I have no significant objections. It does bring SRU closer into line >>> with the way that the rest of the world seems to be going. OAI-ORE >>> [which has been eating up a lot of my time these past few months] uses >>> ATOM as its primary serialisation, so it would be nice to explore the >>> synergies between ATOM/SRU and ATOM/OAI-ORE. >>> >>> What are the intentions for Explain and Scan, which don't fit into the >>> ATOM response quite so conveniently? >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Ray Denenberg wrote: >>> >>> >>>> From: "Ryan Scherle" <rscherle@INDIANA.EDU> >>>> >>>>> Mandating Atom would have the practical effect of killing off the SRU >>>>> response format, >>>>> >>>> Yes but what would be the practical effect of that? That's one of the >>>> questions the committee is curious about. How much is invested in that >>>> format, how much disruption would it cause an implementation to >>>> replace it >>>> with another, functionally equivalent format? >>>> >>>> >>>>> If it is possible to use Atom >>>>> in a way that feels like it was designed for search responses, great. >>>>> >>>> Well, ATOM is used in OpenSearch. >>>> >>>> --Ray >>>> >>>> >> -- >> Regards, >> Farrukh Najmi >> >> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]