search-ws message

Subject: RE: [search-ws] Scan as a query type

From: "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>
To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>,<search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:29:30 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
>
> Ok that makes sense.  So one database for the real records and
> a second database (or however many you want) for the term records.

No, that doesn't make sense.  If you do that, then we have to start
specifying linkages between databases in the explain records.

Ralph

References:
- Scan as a query type
  - From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
- RE: [search-ws] Scan as a query type
  - From: "Matthew J. Dovey" <m.dovey@jisc.ac.uk>
- Re: [search-ws] Scan as a query type
  - From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
- RE: [search-ws] Scan as a query type
  - From: "Matthew J. Dovey" <m.dovey@jisc.ac.uk>
- Re: [search-ws] Scan as a query type
  - From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>