[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: description language
SWS Committee Members --
We need redirect our efforts towards the
description language; as we said at Thurday's call, aside from Janifer and
me, all members should focus attention on this. (Meanwhile Janifer and I
will work on the openSearch binding and I will work on getting the other
documents ready for release).
Ralph - you weren't at the call Thursday so we have
volunteered you to work on this. Larry and Rob agreed to join in the
effort. So this means Ashley, Ralph, Larry, and
Rob. Matthew -- would you be able to help
with this?
To reiterate what we discussed at the call: the
descriptive language needs to describe both an arbitrary sever and one that
supports, for example, SRU 1.2. The current draft treats arbitrary servers only.
The language needs to be powerful and descriptive enough that if a server
supports, for example, SRU 1.2, it can completely describe itself, without ever
saying that it supports SRU 1.2. If a server supports openSearch it needs
to be able to describe that via the description language, that is, our
description language needs to be compatible with the openSearch description
language.
Could one of you volunteer to quickly draft up
a document for discussion that treats both SRU 1.2 and openSearch?
Any other observations or comments about
this?
--Ray
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]