Re: [search-ws] CQL Query on structured data.

["Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>]

Well I'm sorry to hear that, but no worry, the issue will still be around,
at least until the following call.  --Ray

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>
To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>;
<search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: [search-ws] CQL Query on structured data.


Sadly, I won't be on the Monday call.

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:06 AM
> To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [search-ws] CQL Query on structured data.
>
> On the agenda for Monday.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>
> To: "Kerry Blinco" <kblinco@powerup.com.au>;
> <search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 10:25 AM
> Subject: RE: [search-ws] CQL Query on structured data.
>
>
> I'd really hate to see us try to shoehorn structure searching into CQL.
> I'd
> rather see support for XQuery as the query grammar in SRU than make CQL
> do
> everything that it already does plus everything that XQuery does.
>
>
>
> Ralph