OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

search-ws message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [search-ws] dc elements


Since the extended version is backwards compatible with the previous,
I'd recommend 1.2.

An annex where?

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:26 AM
> To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [search-ws] dc elements
> 
> If we do, do we give it a new version, and if so 1.2 or 2.0 (currently
> 1.1)?
> 
> Related question: should we include an annex for the DC schema?  (And
> then
> the same question applies about the new elements.)
> 
> --Ray
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>
> To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>;
> <search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:21 AM
> Subject: RE: [search-ws] dc elements
> 
> 
> I'm strongly in favor of updating our document to reflect the
semantics
> of these new elements.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:31 AM
> > To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [search-ws] dc elements
> >
> > In the process of incorporating the DC context set into the CQL
> > document I
> > have run across this question.
> >
> > The DC context set
> > (http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/resources/dc-context-set.html)
> refers
> > to
> > http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/elements.shtml   for
> > semantics
> > for the indexes.
> >
> > However, that now has added several elements beyond the original 15:
> > it has added: audience, provinance, rightsHolder,
> instructionalMethod,
> > accrualMethod, accrualPeriodicity, accrualPolicy
> >
> > Should we revise the DC set to add these elements, or stick with the
> 15
> > and
> > eliminate this reference?  My preference is the latter.
> >
> > --Ray
> >
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> > https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]