RE: [search-ws] dc elements

["LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>]

Fine by me!

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Nicholas [mailto:opoudjis@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Nick
> Nicholas
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 9:17 PM
> To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [search-ws] dc elements
> 
> 
> On 18/04/2009, at 00:21, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
> 
> > I'm strongly in favor of updating our document to reflect the
> > semantics
> > of these new elements.
> 
> I disagree. These elements are DC Collections Application Profile; the
> original 15 remain the original 15 for Dublin Core. The fact that
> http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/elements.shtml
>   gives semantics for both DC Core and DC Collections shouldn't mean
> the DC context set should cover both. (After all, why not include all
> the other terms in http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ ?)
> 
> It makes more sense to stick with the 15 in a DC Core profile, minimal
> and interoperable. Define these other terms in a distinct DC
> Collections context set, and keep the reference as normative only for
> the 15 in the DC Core context set. (The reference happens to apply to
> both context sets, but I don't see why this is a problem --- there's
> no overlap.)
> 
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> >> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:31 AM
> >> To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
> >> Subject: [search-ws] dc elements
> >>
> >> In the process of incorporating the DC context set into the CQL
> >> document I
> >> have run across this question.
> >>
> >> The DC context set
> >> (http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/resources/dc-context-set.html)
> > refers
> >> to
> >> http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/elements.shtml   for
> >> semantics
> >> for the indexes.
> >>
> >> However, that now has added several elements beyond the original
15:
> >> it has added: audience, provinance, rightsHolder,
> >> instructionalMethod,
> >> accrualMethod, accrualPeriodicity, accrualPolicy
> >>
> >> Should we revise the DC set to add these elements, or stick with
the
> > 15
> >> and
> >> eliminate this reference?  My preference is the latter.
> >>
> >> --Ray
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that
> >> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/
> >> my_workgroups.php
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> > https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ^
> ^
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ^
> Dr Nick Nicholas; Link Affiliates,      opoudjis@optushome.com.au
> Melbourne          skype:opoudjis       http://www.opoudjis.net
> "Despite millions of dollars of research, death continues to be this
> nation's number one killer."    --- Henry Gibson, Kentucky Fried
Movie.
>
_______________________________________________________________________
> ___
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>