We’ve got plenty of them just around here, both applications and
stylesheets.
Nothing we’ve done so far would break general XML parsing
tools. Removing an element and replacing it with another falls into the
category of “breaking”.
Ralph
From: Ray Denenberg,
Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:43 AM
To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [search-ws] xQuery/XCQL
How
many implementations of the echoed request do you think there are?
And we're talking about version 2.0, which already has quite a few
application-breakers.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 28,
2009 9:39 AM
Subject: RE: [search-ws]
xQuery/XCQL
Other than breaking all the applications that are expecting to
find that element?
Let’s not do that.
Ralph
From: Ray Denenberg,
Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:51 PM
To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [search-ws] xQuery/XCQL
Would
anyone object to/see a problem with changing the name of the
<xQuery> element of >echoedSearchRetrieveRequest>
...... to <xcql>.
xQuery
is confusing because of its similarity to W3C XQuery.
|