Re: [search-ws] Propose to move call to Feb. 8

[Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optusnet.com.au>]

Funnily enough, I am planning to dial in next meeting --- my group's circumstances mean I need to reengage. 9:30 EST is doable still for me; I'm not as enthusiastic about 10:00.

On 29/01/2010, at 01:46, LeVan,Ralph wrote:

> I can be there.
>  
> Are we still getting callers from Australia?  Is there any chance we can push that call back to 9:30?
>  
> As you’ve noticed, I have a real hard time making that 9:00 call.  I’ll try very hard to be there next time, but a change in schedule would be a great help to me.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Ralph
>  
>  
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:40 PM
> To: OASIS SWS TC
> Subject: [search-ws] Propose to move call to Feb. 8
>  
> I  suggest moving the February 1 call back one week to February 8.  
>  
> I don't think we've made enough progress since the last call to have another call this coming Monday, and I'm not going to be able to get much done in the next couple days.
>  
> Anyone cannot make Feb. 8?
>  
> --Ray

--------------------=================================---------------------- 
 Dr Nick Nicholas, Link Affiliates, Melbourne     skype:opoudjis     
        http://www.opoudjis.net        opoudjis@optusnet.com.au
"Electronic editors have to live in hope: hope that the long-awaited        
standards for encoding texts for the computer will arrive; hope that they   
will be workable; hope that software will appear to handle these texts;     
hope that all the scholars of the world will have computers which can       
drive the software (which does not yet exist) to handle the texts (which    
have not yet been made) encoded in standard computer markup (which has not   
yet been devised). To hope for all this requires a considerable belief in   
the inevitability of progress and in the essential goodness of mankind."    
                                                    (Peter M.W. Robinson)