search-ws message

Subject: RE: [search-ws] recordPacking (Reprise)

From: "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>
To: "Hammond, Tony" <t.hammond@nature.com>,"Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>,"OASIS SWS TC" <search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:25:24 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hammond, Tony [mailto:t.hammond@nature.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 11:02 AM
> 
> I see it more as a processing hint (or a behaviour) than as a proper
> schema change.

Sorry, but I too thought we had nailed this down.  So, let's start all
over.

I'm all in favor of hints.  What is the intent of the hint?  When the
client says "recordPacking=unpacked", what is the server supposed to do?
 
Ralph

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [search-ws] recordPacking (Reprise)
  - From: "Hammond, Tony" <t.hammond@nature.com>

References:
- Re: [search-ws] recordPacking (Reprise)
  - From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
- Re: [search-ws] recordPacking (Reprise)
  - From: "Hammond, Tony" <t.hammond@nature.com>