RE: [search-ws] resultSetIdleTime/resultSetTTL

["LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:29 AM
> 
> Well another possibility, which I should have thought of, would be to
change
> idle time to TTL in the response. This would be equally disruptive and
> equally simplifying to just eliminating idle time.   Actually, I think
it
> would be a more logical approach.

Sorry, but I still think Idle Time is the right way to manage result
sets.  As long as the client keeps referring to the result set, it
should stay alive.  The fact that we got the name of the request
parameter wrong is the only problem I see here.  I treat that parameter
as a request to set the idle time.

Ralph