Re: [search-ws] resultSetIdleTime/resultSetTTL

["Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>]

From: "Hammond, Tony" <t.hammond@nature.com>
> I tend to think that your previous mail was more on target: just keep a 
> TTL
> on both sides. (Or if one prefers, call it idleTime both sides.)

Ok, here is one more attempt to resolve this prior to the call, I think this 
might make both you and Ralph happy.

Remove TTL altogether. Client proposes an idle time.  Server may or may not 
respond with an idle time.  If it does not, nothing may be inferred from the 
fact that it does not. The server may manage the result set any way it wants 
to, including via idle time, ttl, or otherwise, but idle time is the only 
way visible to the protocol.

--Ray