Stability of 2.0 Schema?

["Hammond, Tony" <t.hammond@nature.com>]

Hi:

I was wondering what the general opinion here is regarding the overall
stability and roadworthiness of the 2.0 schema. I know that we are still
very much in 2.0 draft mode and that all the usual caveats apply but am in a
position where I need to start adding support to nature.com OpenSearch for
facets (and hence migrating to the 2.0 schema). The timeframe is imminent.
So that doesn't give us any leeway here. :)

Any thoughts, etc.?

Cheers,

Tony 

ps/
Btw, you may be interested to know that we have a new release of OpenSearch
currently in testing and which should be going live by end of this month and
which is making use of the "extraRecordData" element to pass through (so
called) "extra metadata" packaged up as Atom Entry docs.


********************************************************************************   
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is
not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error
please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage
mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept
liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not
expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or one of its agents.
Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents
accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or
its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and 
attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan 
Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan 
Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number 785998 
Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS   
********************************************************************************