RE: [search-ws] FW: New Paper on Case Study in OpenSearch/SRU Integration

["Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>]

Tony - thanks, it's nice to have something current to point to  - something
more current than Jan. 09. I've replaced the link on the SRU page.  Nice
article.  

(Now that you're done with that, you'll have time to finish the OpenSearch
binding!)

 --Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Hammond, Tony [mailto:t.hammond@nature.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 10:54 AM
To: 'OASIS SWS TC'
Subject: [search-ws] FW: New Paper on Case Study in OpenSearch/SRU
Integration

Hi:

Just for the record am cc'ing the SWS TC on this announcement to the SRU
list of our D-Lib paper on OpenSearch/SRU Integration.

Note that this documents the behaviour at launch last fall. We have
subsequently been extending the service and adding new features (e.g.
facets) but wanted to focus in the paper on the basic OpenSearch and SRU
aspects of the service.

Cheers,

Tony



------ Forwarded Message
> From: <Hammond>, Tony <t.hammond@nature.com>
> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:47:06 +0100
> To: "SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors" <ZNG@loc.gov>
> Conversation: New Paper on Case Study in OpenSearch/SRU Integration
> Subject: New Paper on Case Study in OpenSearch/SRU Integration
> 
> Hi:
> 
> This paper just published (July 15) in D-Lib Magazine may be of some 
> interest to this list:
> 
>     "nature.com OpenSearch: A Case Study in OpenSearch and SRU
Integration"
>     by Tony Hammond, Nature Publishing Group
>     <http://dlib.org/dlib/july10/hammond/07hammond.html>
> 
> Abstract: "This paper provides a case study of OpenSearch and SRU 
> integration on the nature.com science publisher platform. These two 
> complementary search methodologies are implemented on top of a common 
> base service and provide alternate interfaces into the underlying 
> search engine. Specific points addressed include query strings, 
> response formats, and service control and discovery. Current 
> applications and future work directions are also discussed."
> 
> The paper compares the OpenSearch and SRU search paradigms and also 
> talks about the OpenSearch Extension for SRU, as well as discusses 
> some lessons for SRU from OpenSearch.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tony
> 
> 

------ End of Forwarded Message


****************************************************************************
****   
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who
is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in
error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other
storage mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its
agents accept liability for any statements made which are clearly the
sender's own and not expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers
Limited or one of its agents.
Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents
accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail
or its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and
attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan
Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan
Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number
785998 
Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS   
****************************************************************************
****


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php