OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

search-ws message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [search-ws] FW: SRU 1.3 / 2.0 and faceted search


Yep

 

From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:46 AM
To: 'OASIS SWS TC'
Subject: [search-ws] FW: SRU 1.3 / 2.0 and faceted search

 

See note below.  I would like to respond that I think that faceted search is stable enough and that his strategy seems sound.  --Ray

 

From: Edo Plantinga [mailto:Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 10:30 AM
To: Denenberg, Ray
Cc: Andre van Brussel; [name removed by OASIS admin]; Michael Rijsdijk; Marco Aarts
Subject: SRU 1.3 / 2.0 and faceted search

 

Dear Mr. Denenberg ,

 

Please allow me to introduce myself. My name is Edo Plantinga and I work for the Dutch government. We are currently migrating the search engine behind the national Dutch government website overheid.nl ("government.nl") to a new search engine. We are taking this opportunity to make the indexed data available via an SRU webservice. For our website, we need faceted search as well. I understand that faceted search is not yet a part of the SRU 1.2 definition, but that it is going to be a part of the SRU 2.0 definition.

I saw that you are the chair of the committee that decides about the SRU 2.0 standard. I hope that you can find the time to answer these short questions. If not, maybe you could be so kind to refer me to somebody who can.

  • Considering that SRU 2.0 is still a draft proposal: Do you feel the facet definition in SRU 2.0 is stable enough to implement at this moment? Do you perhaps have any examples of websites that have succesfully utilized faceted search using the SRU 2.0 specifications?
  • We plan to use the extension mechanism in SRU 1.3 to include the SRU 2.0 facet parameters (i.e. using <extraRequestData> in the request parameters and using <extraResponseData> in the response parameters.). This would make a possible future migration to SRU 2.0 easier. Would you recommend this strategy?

Given the time pressure this part of our project is currently under: if you may respond to me promptly, I would gratefully appreciate it.

Yours sincerely,

Edo Plantinga    -    Technisch adviseur CVDR

__________
Voor technische en andere vragen over de CVDR graag eerst contact met de servicedesk: (070) 889 61 37 / regelgeving@overheid.nl  /  Website CVDR
__________
ICTU - Programma e-Overheid voor Burgers (fusie van voormalige programma's MijnOverheid en Overheid heeft Antwoord© ).
Email: edo.plantinga@ictu.nl / Telefoon: 070 - 889 6276 / Mobiel: 06-2498 1976 

Met vriendelijke groet, 
 
Edo Plantinga  -  Technisch adviseur CVDR
__________
Communicatie omtrent CVDR:
Telefoon Servicedesk (070) 889 61 37
E-mail algemeen: regelgeving@overheid.nl 
__________
ICTU - Programma E-overheid voor Burgers Telefoon: 070 - 889 6276 / Mobiel: 06-2498 1976 / Email: edo.plantinga@ictu.nl 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]