RE: [search-ws] RE: cql-form issues checklist

["Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>]

Separate query types is fine with me, as an abstract solution, but as a
practical matter, what do we call them?  We're calling the (single)
queryType 'cql-form'.  If we have two of these, one for pre-booleans and the
other for post-booleans, would you like to suggest names for these?   --Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: LeVan,Ralph [mailto:levan@oclc.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 2:48 PM
> To: OASIS SWS TC
> Subject: RE: [search-ws] RE: cql-form issues checklist
> 
> > On signalling the operation:  let's say presence of EITHER query or
> > queryType signals searchRetrieve and presence of scanClause signals
> > Scan.  Ok?
> 
> Please
> 
> 
> > It just makes sense to me to add another parameter than to have to
> > have complex semantics like ...
> 
> Since I'm unlikely to ever support this queryType, I'm not going to
> hold my breath for any decision.  But, I still like separate queryTypes
> for pre- and post- Booleans.  It's even less complex than having an
> extra parameter, much less an overloaded parameter.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php