[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: document names
Just one note, to clarify on part numbers, which may be explicit in the prose document titles and in the filenames, as you wish, but it's your option. For the new Overview document, you could: a) leave it un-numbered b) assign it number "1" rather than "0" Your choice. (making eight numbered parts) c) assign it "0" ("Part 0") - Robin On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov> wrote: > I've had preliminary correspondece with our OASIS staff TC coordinator, Robin Cover, and we plan to talk in more detail beginning tomorrow. > > Robin has pointed out some inconsistencies in document names, and as I look at it, I think there needs to be just a bit more clarity in how the names reflect the model. > > I propose the following names for the seven documents (as well as the following logical order): > > 1. searchRetrieve: Abstract Protocol Definition > > 2. SRU searchRetrieve Operation: APD Binding for SRU 1.2 > > 3. SRU searchRetrieve Operation: APD Binding for SRU 2.0 > > 4. searchRetrieve: APD Binding for OpenSearch 1.0 > > 5. CQL: The Contextual Query Language > > 6. SRU Scan Operation > > 7. SRU Explain Operation > > (In addition there would be a number zero, Overview, which Matthew has volunteered to write.) > > Please comment on this, by early tomorrow if possible. > > --Ray > -- Robin Cover OASIS, Director of Information Services Editor, Cover Pages and XML Daily Newslink Email: robin@oasis-open.org Staff bio: http://www.oasis-open.org/people/staff/robin-cover Cover Pages: http://xml.coverpages.org/ Newsletter: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html Tel: +1 972-296-1783
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]