RE: [security-bindings] Proposed alternative artifact type

["Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com>]

Tim,
 
I am attempting to integrate this material with the web browser profile
text. I am a little puzzled by the exact intent here --- when you say ---
 
"If the relying party were to perform the access specified by the URL, then
the response should contain the corresponding assertion."

 

are you suggesting that the relying party is to carry out 

 

GET <URL>

 

and that the result would be the desired assertion(s)??

 

 

- prateek

 

 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Moses [mailto:tim.moses@entrust.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:57 PM
To: 'Oasis security services bindings'
Subject: [security-bindings] Proposed alternative artifact type



Colleagues - Please find attached the proposed wording for the alternative
artifact type.  All the best.  Tim. 

----------------------------------------- 
Tim Moses 
Tel: 613.270.3183