RE: Final text of ballot

[Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>]

Title: RE: Final text of ballot

Colleagues - Here are my votes ...

{AP-1} Generalized or specialized solution
Question: which of these statements do you agree with (only one, please)?
Answer:
1. We should develop a generalized solution as an interim step to satisfying the specific requirements identified by the Use Cases sub-committee.

{AP-2} Questions the PEP can ask the PDP
Question: What type of information should the PEP expect to receive from the PDP?  The answers are not mutually exclusive, so answer "yes" to as many ways as you want.

Answer:
1.      "Yes/No/Can't decide".
(if you answer anything else, you aren't talking to a PEP)
{AP-3}  Question: should we define a PDP-PDP protocol?
Answer:
2.      No.
{AP-4}  The number of assertions in a message
Question: How many assertions may appear in a single message?
Answer:
3.      An unlimited number.
The PEP's question should be clear about the identity of the Principal about whom it asks the specific question. 
{AP-5} Combining components
Question: Should the core assertions/protocols group explicitly identify in its model that components may be combined (e.g. the Authority may be combined with the PDP)?

Answer:
1.      The model should explicitly identify that components of the model may be combined.
{AP-6} Assertion validation component
Question: Should the core assertions/protocols group identify "assertion validation" as a separate component in its model?

Answer:
1.      The model should identify "assertion validation" as a separate component.




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Moses
Tel: 613.270.3183