OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

security-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: Minutes from 10 April meeting

Eve.Maler@Sun.COM wrote:
> EVERYONE: Please note ACTION items below.  Some are due IMMEDIATELY!

apologies, I unfortunately had to juggle some other stuff after our conn call
that took longer than I expected. 

> Bob will need to do the following things to the SAML draft:
> - Remove the requirements and use cases chapter and the
>   issues list appendix

...from draft-sstc-saml-01.pdf

A question this raises is whether draft-sstc-saml-01 is actually going to be
split into three docs rather than two (see below).

> - Replace the old glossary with Jeff's new glossary

The version to use is (one of, at BobB's descretion)..


> - Replace the core assertions section with the new material


Note also that the current version of the "Domain model" doc is (now, apologies
for latency) here..


> - Make any changes to the outline authorized by the decisions
>   taken at F2F #1
> ACTION: Eve to check with Tim (copying security-leaders) on
> whether the Protocols section has also changed and what
> precisely among the currently available draft should be put in.
> ACTION: Jeff to respond to this thread suggesting the proper
> file names for the requirements document and SAML draft

I'm assuming that BobB will be adding a fair amount of value-add front (& back?)
material to the UC&R docs (reqs doc (sometimes called "strawman") and issues
doc), and hence it's worthwhile to issue the so-enhanced docs as different docs
(from the ones produced by UC&R) with different filenames. Hence I suggest that
draft-sstc-saml-01 should "logically" become..


Now, I'm (strongly) suggesting here that we follow the IETF process of "anytime
a brand-new internet-draft *filename* is created, it starts version numbering at
-00, no matter how 'new' or 'old' it's content might be".

If a lot of folks can't live with that, then I suggest we set the version
numbers at -02. 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC