Re: [security-jc] FW: Security Forum program committee - first meeting

[Phil Griffin <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>]

Karl,

I'd prefer to see the likes of "biometrics (XCBF)"
in the text rather than just "biometrics". Having
"SAML" with no explanation as to what "SAML" means
may be OK. And having just "XCBF" would not seem to
be a good idea. But tagging the terms "biometrics"
with "(XCBF)" and "access control" with "(XACML)"
might be helpful.

Phil


Karl F. Best wrote:

> TAB and JC:
> 
> Also FYI, here's a pretty final version of the abstract.
> 
> </karl>
> =================================================================
> Karl F. Best
> OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
> +1 978.667.5115 x206
> karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org
> 
> 
> 
> "For Web services to emerge beyond the brochure, customers will need
> to see an open architectural model that works - and that includes a
> standards-based security framework. Standards organizations provide
> the open, vendor-neutral environment necessary to resolve critical,
> often sensitive issues related to security. The Forum on Security
> Standards for Web Services is designed to provide an overview of the
> Web foundation work currently being accomplished at W3C, including
> XML-SIG, XKMS, Xenc, its model for Web Services Architecture and the
> security segment; and the set of security-related technologies at
> OASIS, including SAML, WS-Security, and standards for access control,
> provisioning, biometrics and digital rights. Attendees will gain
> greater understanding of the relationship between these specifications
> and receive insights on future work, connects, disconnects, overlap
> and synchronicity."
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>