Re: [security-jc] Votes

[Phil Griffin <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>]

Joe,

I realized from the minutes that we ended the meeting
with no agreement that SJC invite the TAB to name a
liaison to attend our meetings, report from the TAB
and take information from SJC back to the TAB.

Carl was following up stating that Eduardo and I could
discuss who would actually perform this task and this
person could be ratified by both the SJC and TAB.

The vote is whether or not to invite the TAB to name a
liaison to the SJC.

We'll vote again if approved, on who will do so.

Phil


PATO,JOE (HP-PaloAlto,ex1) wrote:

> Phil,
> 
> I guess I don't know what the permanent TAB liaison proposal is - so I can't
> vote. The last I see is Karl suggesting that the chairs of the TAB and the
> SJC get together and then make a proposal to their respective groups.
> 
> - joe
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Griffin [mailto:phil.griffin@asn-1.com] 
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:09 PM
> To: Security Joint Committee
> Subject: [security-jc] Votes
> 
> 
> There are two proposals on the table, one on WSS
> attending our next meeting, and another on us
> agreeing to a permanent TAB liaison.
> 
> Please vote on both if you have only voted on
> one or the other.
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>