Re: [security-jc] Security Vocabulary Draft

["Phillip H. Griffin" <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>]

Monica,

It was decided on our last call that I would just start with
collecting information from SJC member TC documents.

But we can ask that a new TC consider other sources. We
should discuss this on or before our next SJC meeting.

Phil


Monica Martin wrote:

>Phil,
>Suggest that you also look at the 'in work' UN/CEFACT glossary for some
>of the terms like Business Transaction.  Shouldn't we add definitions
>for nonce, password, etc. as well?
>
>URL for working glossary - I believe it is under general folder:
>http://homepage.mac.com/WebObjects/FileSharing.woa/wa/default?user=knauj
>ok&templatefn=FileSharing6.html&xmlfn=TKDocument.6.xml&sitefn=TKSite.3.x
>ml&aff=consumer&cty=US&lang=en
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Phillip H. Griffin [mailto:phil.griffin@asn-1.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:19 AM
>To: [OASIS SJC]
>Subject: [security-jc] Security Vocabulary Draft
>
>
>Here's something for the group to consider. I do not really expect
>comments on the terms and definitions I've collected, though please
>feel free to do so.
>
>Rather, I'd really like for us to focus primarily on the Considerations
>and Abstract and References sections of this draft.
>
>As to references, these are WIP. But it would be nice for us to suggest
>some common format for referencing OASIS standards, committee
>specifications and committee drafts.
>
>On the Abstract, it would be nice to add some text - more than just the
>sentence I've got here. Perhaps a statement of purpose.
>
>On the Considerations, perhaps we should remove the text I've written
>and replace it with concrete recommendations to the TAB. If we do this,
>I'd like for us to address some concerns I've gotten from a couple of
>members off line as to how we'd like to see the authorities practice and
>behave - encourage rather than dictate - recommend rather than require
>- advise rather than demand. That sort of thing.
>
>Phil
>
>
>  
>