[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference?
Hi, Good point. My suggestion is to have one standards track, one developers track and of course mention SAML in product talks as needed by the various vendors. Would this be a better plan of action ? Or do we want only one standards track or just one developers track ? cheers |-----Original Message----- |From: Jeremy Epstein [mailto:jepstein@webmethods.com] |Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:04 PM |To: Jahan Moreh; Krishna Sankar; ROUAULT,JASON (HP-FtCollins,ex1); |Mishra, Prateek; oasis sstc |Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference? | | |Not trying to tell anyone what to do, but.... do you think you'd stand a |better chance of getting SAML accepted on the agenda if there were one or |more *joint* proposals, instead of a bunch of individual ones? Will the |conference team say "we can't pick which one, so let's reject them all"? |Based on last year, my gut feeling is that they're not going to accept a |whole bunch of SAML presentations... so a consortium approach might be a |reasonable compromise. | |Just a thought... |--Jeremy | |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC