RE: Submission to RSA Conference?

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Hi,
	Good point. My suggestion is to have one standards track, one developers
track and of course mention SAML in product talks as needed by the various
vendors.

Would this be a better plan of action ? Or do we want only one standards
track or just one developers track ?

cheers

  |-----Original Message-----
  |From: Jeremy Epstein [mailto:jepstein@webmethods.com]
  |Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:04 PM
  |To: Jahan Moreh; Krishna Sankar; ROUAULT,JASON (HP-FtCollins,ex1);
  |Mishra, Prateek; oasis sstc
  |Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference?
  |
  |
  |Not trying to tell anyone what to do, but.... do you think you'd stand a
  |better chance of getting SAML accepted on the agenda if there were one or
  |more *joint* proposals, instead of a bunch of individual ones?  Will the
  |conference team say "we can't pick which one, so let's reject them all"?
  |Based on last year, my gut feeling is that they're not going to accept a
  |whole bunch of SAML presentations... so a consortium approach might be a
  |reasonable compromise.
  |
  |Just a thought...
  |--Jeremy
  |
  |