[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: draft-sstc-core-10 sec 1.4.4.2 Element <Evidence>
> > As with any new element, there are bound to be questions about the > Element <Evidence> defined by section 1.4.4.2 of draft-sstc-core-10 > and core-discussion-00 sections 3.1.1, 4.1.14, and 4.2.3. Here are > several that may benefit from clarification and discussion. > > 1) Is saml:evidence different from saml:advice? Already > xtass:evidence > shares identical wording with saml:advice, including the missing \) XTASS is a research note, it is not a standards proposal. All the features of XTASS are supported by SAML and XTAML which is an extension schema to SAML. I don't see the missing /, but I may be looking at a different copy of the schema since I am editing it at the moment: The <Advice> element permits additional information to be included in an assertion that MAY be ignored by applications without affecting either the assertion semantics or validity. Advice elements MAY be specified in an extension schema. The advice element MAY be used to: · Include evidence supporting the assertion claims to be cited, either directly (through incorporating the claims) or indirectly (by reference to the supporting assertions. · State a proof of the assertion claims. · Specify the timing and distribution points for updates to the assertion. The following schema defines the <Advice> element: <element name="Advice" type="saml:AdviceType"/> <complexType name="AdviceType"> <sequence> <any namespace="##any" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </sequence> </complexType> </schema> Phill
Phillip Hallam-Baker (E-mail).vcf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC