[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Proposed Changes to Core-12 (with renaming)
Bob, This is an open issue from the f2f#3 meeting (ISSUE:[F2F#3-37]). The general sense seemed to be that people wanted to be able to omit the namespace and that somehow there was a canonical namespace in which names are interpreted (SAML namespace?). I dont think we actually spelled this out completely. - prateek >> >>In the AttributeNameType structure, AttributeNamespace has minimum >>cardinality zero; does this mean that >>the AttributeName is drawn from a canonical default namespace >>(if so, do we >>specify what this namespace is)? >>Or does it permit ambiguity of reference. If the latter, I'm >>nervous.... >> >>Here's the structure I'm referring to: >> >><complexType name="AttributeNameType"> >> <element ref="AttributeName"> >> <element ref="AttributeNamespace" minOccurs="0"> >></complexType> >> >> >>--bob >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC