RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code

[Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com>]

Actually, I checked and the whiteboard transcription says "AuthN type". I
consider AuthN Method to be preferable.

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:pbaker@verisign.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:48 PM
> To: 'Hal Lockhart'; 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code
> 
> 
> I think it came off the whiteboard.
> 
> I would very much like to rename it, AuthenticationMethod 
> sounds good to me.
> I think we should also rename the protocol element in 
> <Authenticator> to be
> the same.
> 
> [We can also change authenticator but that is another story and first
> someone needs to come up with a better name, HolderOfKey being worse]
> 
> Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
> Principal Scientist
> VeriSign Inc.
> pbaker@verisign.com
> 781 245 6996 x227
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@entegrity.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:29 PM
> > To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> > Subject: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code
> > 
> > 
> > I was wondering why the term "Authentication Code" was 
> chosen for the
> > consensus schema. I thought we had been using "Authentication 
> > Method" a term
> > that seems more intuitive to me.
> > 
> > Hal
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> > 
> 
> 
>