[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Does SAML browser binding assume existing SSO infrastructure? wasRE: one time use saml artifact
[Hal] Personally I have no problem with this approach, as our product like yours currently has these mechanisms, but in past, others have expressed an intention to use SAML as the entire infrastructure. This would require that SAML specify the entire solution without any such preconditions. I recall Irving Reid, for one, expressing this view. Perhaps this assumption in your approach should be raised more explicitly to TC as a whole. Hal [Prateek] Hal, I am not a use-case fundamentalist, but I would have to say that such a broad expansion of our efforts would require a substantial revsion of the use-case document. I do not view this as an "assumption in my approach" -- instead I view this as a direct consequence of the current use-case and requirements document. At any rate, we will certainly get (more than) a chance to discuss it at the f2f and later. - prateek
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC