[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Issues to be closed at the Sept 4 Concall (revised list)
> Well, yes, but... Here are some consequences of having two separate > schemas identified with two separate namespaces: ... > Based on the above analysis, I do feel comfortable having two schemas > instead of one. If anyone DISAGREES with this, then DS-4-05 should > probably stay open, but everyone AGREES (e.g., by not > replying to this > message :-), then we could safely close it. No, as a matter of procedure, this batch of closed issues are supposed to be completely non-controversial. Since at least one person has a substantive concern about this issue, I will remove it from this list, without prejudice to the way we resolve the issue. Just so everybody is clear, the revised list is attached. Hal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC