[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Bindings Committee Recommendation: SAML HTTP Binding should b e mandatory-to-implement
> BEA strongly believes in option #2, and will vote that way if > asked. This > is not a marketing "buzz" but real need. I am also inclined towards #2, but I would like to hear your reasons. Since the Binding has only to do with the exchange of SAML requests and responses between SAML-aware parties, it can not be a need for interoperability with existing SOAP applications. Hal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC