[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Comments on core-21
At 03:23 PM 12/11/01 -0500, Eve L. Maler wrote: >I just realized something: Conditions does *not* have an abstract type. I >thought we wanted to force people to write an extension schema so that >their "mustUnderstand"-type semantics would be forced to be documented at >least a little. But I may be behind the times. Can this question be >added to the issue below? Thanks. Okay, I'm starting to get brain cramp. Ignore; <Condition> (singular) *does* have an abstract type. Sorry. -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC