[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Minutes for Telecon, Tuesday Jan 22, 2002
Agreed. I dont think there is any intention here to ignore external reviews. I would propose that one or more individuals be assigned to work thru the comments and act as interlocutors. - prateek >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie] >>Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:59 AM >>To: oasis sstc >>Subject: Re: [security-services] Minutes for Telecon, Tuesday Jan 22, >>2002 >> >> >> >>Bob, >> >>> - RLBob: referring to msg from Stephen Farrell, unless some voting >>> member picks up items from his msg and champion them, >>they will not >>> become issues for consideration before going to last call >> >>While that's fair enough (esp. since I could be a voting member if >>I wanted), I would assume that the editors will review and take >>account of all substantive comments received, and handle them as >>appropriate (creating an issue or whatever). Otherwise, why ask for >>external review? >> >>Stephen. >> >> >>-- >>____________________________________________________________ >>Stephen Farrell >>Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 >>39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 >>Dublin 8. mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie >>Ireland http://www.baltimore.com >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------- >>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC