OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

security-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: [security-services] Fragment identifiers (again)

> (This also raises an auxiliary question: Should SAML be
> xml:base-aware?

The W3C rules (for what it's worth) require every XML spec to be
xml:base-aware, even if they say "no special semantics."

I believe the intent is less that someone may define xml:base, but
rather that (as in xml dsig) you define an entity, &dsig, for the base,
so things like &disg;#x509data make sense.

SOAP, of course, does not allow DTD's, so no entitities, so there's no
gain.  And using xml:base there might be confusing, since some SOAP
toolkits might want to use it themselves.  (None that I know of, but
Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC