[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Issues Status
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Hal Lockhart wrote: > Here is the current status report. > > Irving, Prateek, Eve, Phill, Polar, RL Bob, Scott,Simon and Rob you are > listed as Champions for issues. Please confirm that you agree with my > assessment of the status. I'm listed as champion of issue DS-4-11. I still think that returning no statements would still be consistent and do not see a problem of why the syntax should not allow such a thing, since it is harmless. There is nothing wrong with 0, just as there is nothing wrong with vacuous truth. Cheers, -Polar > > Document Authors look at the Red items and see if you need to make a change > to close the issue. > > Ones I think are about to fall thru the cracks: > > I don't think the Empty Strings issue has been resolved or did I miss that? > > I think the spec should say that no attributes in an attribute query means > "all the attributes you are entitled to see." If this is not acceptable, I > think it should at least say "the intended meaning is that all attributes > available by policy should be returned. An implementation may not interpret > this request as asking for no attributes." > > We still do not have a "Bearer" Subject Confirmation method, even though the > bindings spec says there is one. > > Hal > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC