[security-services] RE: Agreed issues with text - DEADLINE COB TODAY -GET YOUR CORRE CTIONS IN

[Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com>]

Title: RE: Agreed issues with text - DEADLINE COB TODAY - GET YOUR CORRECTIONS IN

Just a reminder to everyone to make sure that this list of agreed issues with text is correct. As of COB today, the editors will apply them to the specifications.

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Lockhart
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:22 PM
> To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Subject: Agreed issues with text
>
>
> The following open issues appear to have proposed text which
> has been agreed to (or at least not objected to for some time).
>
> DS-1-11 Subject Confirmation vs. AuthN Method
>
> I proposed text on 2/6.
>
> DS-1-12 Clarify NameIdentifier
>
> I think the message from Scott on 3/11 is final.
>
> DS-4-14 AuthorityKind and RespondWith
>
> Irving proposed text in the original message on 2/25. The use
> of qnames was debated and agreed to. The text was never commented on.
>
> DS-9-13 AuthNQuery underspecified
>
> I believe the text proposed by Jeff on 3/2 is accepted.
>
> DS-11-08 Action and Actions
>
> I believe Irving's second message on this subject on 2/25 has
> been agreed.
>
> DS-14-07 BearerIndication
>
> I believe the agreed text can be found in an "old" version of core.
>
> DS-14-17 Remove Assertion Specifier
>
> This is ELM-2. The text is in Eve's message from 3/7.
>
> DS-14-18 Change Evidence
>
> This is ELM-3. The text is in Eve's message from 3/7.
>
> MS-1-02 URI References
>
> This is ELM-6. The text is in Eve's message from 3/7.
> However, note that it may require many chages throughout the
> documents.
>
> MS-2-02 Acknowledgements
>
> The text is in a message from Eve on 2/11.
>
> MS-5-04 Use Response in Post
>
> The text is in a message from Prateek on 3/5.
>
> ---------
>
> The text for Irving's SAML WSDL file has been agreed, but we
> have not agreed where it should go. This is:
>
> MS-5-08 Publish WSDL
>
> Hal
>